IJESD 2026 Vol.17(4): 348-356
doi: 10.18178/ijesd.2026.17.4.1596

Comparative Modeling of Air Pollutants in Malaysian Cities Using Correlation, Causality, and Neural Network Approaches

Norazrin Ramli1,2,*, Zulkifli A. Rais1, Norazian M. Noor1,2, Ahmad Z. Ul-Saufie3, Hazrul A. Hamid4, and Mohd Khairul N. Mahmad5
1Faculty of Civil Engineering & Technology, Universiti Malaysia Perlis, Arau 02600, Perlis, Malaysia
2Sustainable Environment Research Group (SERG) Centre of Excellence Geopolymer and Green Technology (CEGeoGTech), Universiti Malaysia Perlis, Arau 02600, Perlis, Malaysia
3Faculty of Computer and Mathematical Sciences, Universiti Teknologi Mara (UiTM), Shah Alam 40450, Selangor, Malaysia
4School of Distance Education, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Gelugor 11800, Penang, Malaysia
5Mining and Energy Resources Academy (MERA), Jalan Kuala Ketil, Parit Panjang, 09100 Baling, Kedah
Email: norazrin@unimap.edu.my (N.R.); zulkiflirais@studentmail.unimap.edu.my (Z.A.R.); norazian@unimap.edu.my (N.M.N.); ahmadzia101@uitm.edu.my (A.Z.U.); hazrul@usm.my (H.A.H.); nizam.mahmad@gmail.com (M.K.N.M.)
*Corresponding author
Manuscript received November 17, 2025; revised February 10, 2026; accepted March 6, 2026; published August 19, 2026

AbstractAir quality prediction plays a crucial role in addressing urban environmental challenges and supporting sustainable policy interventions. This study presents a comparative modeling analysis of five major air pollutants (PM₁₀, SO₂, NO₂, O₃, and CO) across three Malaysian cities: Nilai, Larkin, and Pasir Gudang. Observed pollutant concentrations were modeled using three approaches: Pearson correlation, Granger causality, and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), with performance evaluated using Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Mean Error (ME), Normalized Absolute Error (NAE), and the coefficient of determination (R²). The results revealed that Multiple Linear Regression (MLR), guided by Pearson correlation-based variable selection, consistently provided the highest accuracy (R² > 0.95) across all cities, highlighting the predominance of linear pollutant-meteorological relationships. ANN exhibited moderate-to-strong performance (R² = 0.53–0.74), particularly in Pasir Gudang, where industrial complexity introduced nonlinear emission behaviors. Granger causality contributed supplementary insights into temporal dependencies but yielded lower predictive accuracy. Comparative outcomes demonstrated clear spatial variability, with Nilai and Larkin favoring linear modeling due to stable emission patterns, while Pasir Gudang benefited from ANN’s nonlinear adaptability. This study underscores the importance of combining correlation-driven linear modeling with data-intelligent nonlinear approaches to improve air-quality forecasting reliability in Malaysia. The findings provide valuable guidance for data-driven environmental policy and the design of hybrid predictive frameworks for sustainable urban air management in Southeast Asia.

Keywordsair pollution modeling, air quality prediction, granger causality, Pearson correlation, artificial neural network

[PDF]

Cite: Norazrin Ramli, Zulkifli A. Rais, Norazian M. Noor, Ahmad Z. Ul-Saufie, Hazrul A. Hamid, and Mohd Khairul N. Mahmad, "Comparative Modeling of Air Pollutants in Malaysian Cities Using Correlation, Causality, and Neural Network Approaches," International Journal of Environmental Science and Development vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 348-356, 2026.

Copyright © 2026 by the authors. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Article Metrics in Dimensions