IJESD 2025 Vol.16(6): 419-425
doi: 10.18178/ijesd.2025.16.6.1550

Energy Valorization of Cashew Nut Shells: Characterization of Volatile Organic Compounds and Quantitative Health Risk Assessment in Pyrolysis and Direct Combustion Processes

Anselme Bagoro1,*, Marie Sawadogo1, Anthony Benoist2, Sayon dit Sadio Sidibe1, and Igor W.K. Ouedraogo1
1Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Laboratory (LabEREE), International Institute for Water and Environmental Engineering (2iE), Rue de la Science, Ouagadougou P.O. Box 594, Burkina Faso
2Biomass Wood Energy and Bioproducts Unit (BioWooEB), CIRAD, F-97743 Saint Denis, Reunion, France
Email: anselme.bagoro@2ie-edu.org (A.B.); marie.sawadogo@2ie-edu.org (M.S.); anthony.benoist@cirad.fr (A.B.); sayon.sidibe@2ie-edu.org (S.S.S.); igor.ouedraogo@2ie-edu.org (I.W.K.O.)
*Corresponding author
Manuscript received March 7, 2025; revised June 9, 2025; accepted June 27, 2025; published November 21, 2025

Abstract—This study evaluates the health risks associated with exposure to atmospheric emissions from energy recovery of cashew nut shells through pyrolysis and combustion processes. The analysis focuses on two risk categories: carcinogenic risks, assessed by the Individual Risk Excess (ERI), and noncarcinogenic risks, estimated by the Hazard Quotient (HQ). Samples were collected at the source (industrial chimney) using isokinetic sampling on activated carbon tubes and subsequently analyzed by gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry to identify and quantify Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs). These concentrations were then modelled at 500 meters using an atmospheric dispersion model of the Screening Modelling in Air Quality Assessment type. The results show that benzene and 1,3-butadiene are the primary contributors to carcinogenic risks, with a total ERI exceeding the acceptable threshold of 10⁵. For benzene, direct combustion poses approximately 1.7 times the risk compared to pyrolysis. Similarly, 1,3-butadiene shows a risk reduction with pyrolysis (about 1.3 times lower). Overall, pyrolysis reduces the total carcinogenic risk by 26.9% when compared to direct combustion. Regarding non-carcinogenic risks, the Hazard Quotients (HQ) for toluene (4.38×10−5 for combustion and 4.03×10−5 for pyrolysis) and styrene (5.8×10-4 for combustion and 1.9×10-4 for pyrolysis) remain below 1, indicating limited short-term health effects. Comparing the two recovery processes, the overall hazard quotients show a slight reduction of 11.1% between direct combustion and pyrolysis of cashew nut shells. The study recommends technological improvements and strict regulatory measures to sustainably manage emissions sustainably, thereby protecting public health and the environment.

Keywords—energy valorization, cashew nut shells, Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs), health risks, modelling in air quality assessment, pyrolysis and combustion

[PDF]

Cite: Anselme Bagoro, Marie Sawadogo, Anthony Benoist, Sayon dit Sadio Sidibe, and Igor W.K. Ouedraogo, "Energy Valorization of Cashew Nut Shells: Characterization of Volatile Organic Compounds and Quantitative Health Risk Assessment in Pyrolysis and Direct Combustion Processes," International Journal of Environmental Science and Development vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 419-425, 2025.

Copyright © 2025 by the authors. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Article Metrics in Dimensions